Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Did Neil Armstrong really land on moon??
If you say yes....Then read it......
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE
Issue 1 :
Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible.
Issue 2:
The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.
Issue 3 :
There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon.
Issue 4 :
In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon.
Issue 5:
How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?
Issue 6 :
There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.
Issue 7 :
The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?
Issue 8:
The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake. This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.
Issue 9:
There is no dust on LM footpads. -- According to Kaysing and Fox, this is the strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked. They allege that with the swirling dust from LM descent engine, the foot pads should be covered with dust.
Issue 10 :
The pictures below show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew.
THERE ARE MANY MORE ISSUES ON THIS, BUT THOSE ARE TOO TECHNICAL FOR ME..........
MAY BE.......NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON !!!!
153 comments:
hahahahahthanks for the entertainment =D
gr8 thinking dude. i thought neil was the 1st one to land on the moon but by the evidence you gave, i believe that no one landed on the moon and it's all fake. thank's a lot deepak
This is some great evidence. I now can't make up my mind if the moon landing is fake or not. Almost everyone says the moon landing was real. But from this evidence, I'm starting to think it was fake. Thanks a lot deepak.
this is such a lie you should be sewed and put in jail! Lier Lier Lier Lier Lier
i believe it was a setup
by USA
to prove they are ahead of Russia
in their Space Research....
Itz all a studio photo shoot..
here's another thing, if neil Armstrong landed on the moon and put the flag in the ground on the moon, then howcome we cant see it from earth's telescopes
None of this evidence is accurate. Also most of the people reading this blog are not smart enough to find out. If the moon landing was fack, the first one to say it would have been the Soviet Union (Not Russia). The external light sources were the lights from the space ship and NASA used special film. Please research more before saying things like this. You are giving people bad info!
are you stupid?
your facts are crap!
@anonymous
[i]None of this evidence is accurate. Also most of the people reading this blog are not smart enough to find out. If the moon landing was fack, the first one to say it would have been the Soviet Union (Not Russia). The external light sources were the lights from the space ship and NASA used special film. Please research more before saying things like this. You are giving people bad info![/i]
I have got the explanation behond all this...
I would provide it to my readers later.
It's obvious that whoever thiks that the Moon landing was faked wasn't around in the 1960's. There was a Cold War on, and the USA and Soviet Russia were watching each other intently. If the Moon landing had been a fake, the Soviets would have known about it. I remember the Moon landing when a child, and I can tell you this - Armstrong did walk on the Moon. Moreover, signals sent from equipment left by Aldrin in 1969 still send their messages today.
Issue 1 (multiple light sources) - there'd also be more than one shadow for each person. They're standing on separate 'hillocks'.
Issue 2 (shadows remain absolutely black) - not the case; take a close-up look at some of the images - the lunar surface is easily seen. Also, the reason for the 'filled in' appearance is due to simple light reflection - it's extremely bright on the Moon.
Issue 3 - (no stars visible) - true - simply because the surface reflections were so bright and the film wasn't designed to take images of stars (try taking an image of stars in daylight on Earth!).
Issue 4 - (huge light source) - no kidding! Really?
Issue 5 - the images are clearly reversed. In addition, the images were taken through the Lunar Rover camera - it was remote controlled from Earth and remained operational for some time after the astronauts left.
Issue 6 (film melting)
the film was inside canisters to protect it from the radiation (including thermal).
Issue 7 (no crater from DSE [Descent Stage Engine] Clearly visible is a considerable amount of erosion - caused by the DSE. In addition, if you ever see an AV-8B landing on grass or dirt, look for craters - the engine of the Harrier is twice as powerful as that of the Lunar Module Descent Stage.
Issue 8 (footprints) Precisely for the reason stated (no water in Lunar soil) as well as the Lunar gravity (one-sixth of Earth), the footprints were (and remain) quite distinct. In addition, the footprints were some distance from the LM; this was far outside the area affected by the DSE.
Issue 9 (no dust on footpads) - quite the contrary; even in the image shown, there is a small amount of dust on the insulation. Also, there was no swirling of dust - no air to get in the way of the dust particles.
Issue 10 (flag waving) - clearly, this is a vidcap - the video shows the astronaut deploying the flag - he moved it. Also, in the Apollo 11 mission, the flag boom didn't deploy properly; resulting in a 'wavy' appearance. This effect was recognised as a 'photo opportunity' and all future Lunar flags were also deployed in this manner deliberatly.
Other items - if Apollo 11 (and other missions) didn't go to the Moon, why didn't Russia say so? The USSR was 'listening in' on the Apollo missions.
Earth-based telescopes aren't powerful enough to see objects as small as the LM descent stage - that's only about 4 metres across - telescopes can only make out details larger than a few hundred metres.
I can only hope that what you've said is intended as a joke. Nevertheless, such jokes can be quite harmfull.
Yeah guys mythbusters (the tv show on discovery channel) proved all your theories wrong and that neil armstrong did infact walk on the moon
I've come across many websites in regards to the moon landing being a hoax. It's very interesting to read that it may of been a conspiracy. If the moon landing was a hoax, then those Astronauts have lots on their conscious. It's well known that the U.S and the Soviet want world domination, so it wouldn't surprise me if the US have faked the moon landing. If the Soviet have kept quiet if it was a fake, then I suppose they would of been payed lots of money to keep it hush. I also read in a few websites that many people involved with the moon landing project have been killed (air disasters, car crash, etc. That seems a little odd, wouldn't you say?
I was a toddler back then, so it's not for me to judge whether the moon landing was genuine or not. If I was Neil Armstrong, I would definately know the truth.
We all have different opinions on this topic, it's good to read what people think.
I also read that Elvis's death was a hoax too. I'm sure people make a fortune from that as well. We the public will never know the truth of what's out there, we're always kept in the dark no matter what. We read interesting headlines every day of our lives, but deep down, we just don't know if certain situations have actually happened. The Media control the way we think and feel.
Was JFK's assassination a hoax too? Lol, maybe a wax dummy was sitting in his place and it received bullets in its head and throat......hoaxes, hoaxes, hoaxes.
Hoaxes are a money laundering project. It wouldn't surprise me if NASA came up with the moon landing hoax so they can feast on their tax payers money.
What about the Apollo 13 incident? Was that a hoax too? Or are all of the Apollo space projects hoaxes as well?
The moon landing was all bogus. Experts have proven that with photos and video footage. Why don't they invest their money on helping the sick and the poor instead of wanting to know what's out there. NASA have top secrets we'll never know of, wouldn't surprise me if they have a hydrogen bomb just like in Terminator 2. They want to wipe us all out and make truce with the aliens. I don't think humans have the knowledge or the technology to land men on the moon. I don't think they had that technology back in the 60's and 70's and don't think they even have it today. It's all bogus conspiracy to get our money. NASA and the mafia work together.
ISLAM IS THE RIGHT RELIOGN BECAUSE HE HEARD THE AZAAN THERE
VERY VERY WELL DONE
BEFORE FEW DAYS I SAW NEIL'S LAND ON MOON PHOTO I SAW THAT THE FLAG WAS MOVING AND I HAD A DOUBT AND I WAS VERY HAPPY TO SEE THAT MY DOUBT WAS RIGHT AND SPECIAL THANKS TO U THAT U GAVE ME MUCH MORE EVIDENCES ABOUT THAT
FROM MAHAN
CHALISGAON
TO DEEPAK
Are we going to ever land on the moon then?
thanks 4 the "evidence". my stomach was really starting to hurt when i LAUGHED MY GUTS OUT! at this fake evidence. u think ur albert einstein? NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!
y dont you just keep ur wrong thinking to urself? and just dont mislead people. UR NOT THE PERSON THAT WENT TO THE MOON, R U? NO DIDNT THINK SO. I HATE PEOPLE WHO TRY TO OUTSMART FACTS. ANYWAYS HAVE U EVEN READ ANY OF UR OTHER COMMENTS??? THEY ALL know THAT ITS FAKE!!!!!!!!! UNLIKE SOMEONE!!!!!!!
it do read my comments...
I will make a follow up to this post (the most read article of my blog)...
I had been keeping that in my mind.
But actually never found time to make such a post.
Will make it really soon.
and Mr.Anonymous...
this is just one of articles on Outsmarting facts...
I am waiting for the "evidence" to disprove many facts, we people believe!
watch the mythbusters show on this and they have some good facts for proving the hoax wrong they do a bunch of experiments on it and they prove this hoax stuff is BS
will watch it anonymous...
neil armstrong was fake enough and america is trying to cover it up by any means
even if this was a setup america pulled the biggest prank on Russia because this "setup" made russia stop their space program so even if it was a fake, america pulled off the biggest prank ever lol
its all a setup from the government!!!! we are all being lied to!, america was just so desperate to win the space race that they had to make up a lame lie about landing on the moon, i dont care if u bring me facts to back it up or not but this was all a lie, go home, u are being lied to. get out of here. our lives are a lie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not convinced, there are simple counters to every argument suggested.
Issue 1. Shadows cast on sloping ground will often appear at different angles to those cast onto flat ground or slopes in other directions.
Issue 2. There could be a second weaker light source i.e. reflected light from the earth. However, this would also cast a second shadow and would fill in shadows cast by the Sun. In any case, light does scatter off a rough surface in all directions and will always provide some illumination all round. Remember, that the camera may also have a light source (flash).
Issue 3. I'm sure I have seen some, however, there are many good reasons why photos may not show the stars. The photos are taken in sunlight which would be very strong on the moons surface with no atmosphere to reduce its intensity. The camera's exposure would be set for very bright conditions and so faint stars would not be seen. Also, many photos are quite low resolution, especially early film and many of the digital reproductions available on the internet. The poor resolution would not register a star, which is only a tiny point of light.
Issue 4. The reflected light source could be the Sun, the Earth or, more likely, a light source on the camera. You'd get the same effect if you used flash photography through a window.
Issue 5. Even in 1969 it was possible to leave a camera on the surface and transmit the pictures via a radio link. No human operator is required.
Issue 6. Maximum surface temperatures of about +123 deg C are typically quoted, which is not beyond the capability of specialist cameras and films of the vintage of the Apollo years. Cameras were (and are) used in far hotter conditions on earth such as inside a blast furnace, near lava flows etc. Actually, its the extreme cold which is more problematic (-233 deg C).
Issue 7. It did kick up dust when it landed and made visibility for the pilot awkward at very low levels. Perhaps also the dust layer was very thin, as there seems to be lots of exposed rock in places. Any dust would quickly settle back down in an atmosphereless environment.
Issue 8. I'm not so sure all the dust would have been blown away from the immediate vacinity of the landing site as there is not wind to disperse it. It will just fall vertically back to the surface. With no air resistance, dust will fall back just as quickly as any rock. Anyway, many of the footprints are away from the landing site. Also, dampness would help form a neat footprint but is not essential. You can make a print in say, talc powder which is dry.
Issue 9. Any dust would be shot away in the direction of the engine exhaust blast (but not swirl as there is no atmosphere). Dust would drop like a stone and so resettle very quickly. The engine blast may well have blasted the LM pads clear of dust.
Issue 10. This is an easy one, the flags were definitely supported by a wire along the top to give the impression that they are wafting in the breeze. NASA needed to do this specifically for the photo shoot.
As may may have guessed, I do not subscribe to the theories which deny the moon landings. Whatever, you may think of NASA, they are not daft and could have been far more thorough had they wanted to hoax the whole thing.
Clive Alabaster
UK
The nuclear weapons are even a bigger hoax, the issue is the world great powers like USA, USSR and others are part of one big masonic government and they fake power struggles between them to make steal taxpayers money.
Hiroshima was bombed with conventional bombings, same as Tokyo. No Nuclear weapon was used since 1945 hoax. I respect Hollywood's work :)
thats not true you should learn all the facts first just because you think that dosn't mean it's true so i sudjest you get rid of this website and go get a book of the truth of neil armstrong you lier... oh and by the way you must be really stupid to make this website..
If you look at other pictures which are easily available from google images it looks as if the flag has a pole running across the top of the material, to hold it up as well as along the side.
And as for the rest, you need to research more before giving your single minded approach to it all :)
Till now i belived that we had landed on the moon.but after reading this i am convinced that no one had landed on the moon and it was just fake.America did all this to compete with russia in the space race
Ive put very much thought into this and for those people who say this is a lie personaly they dont even know if its a lie or not, and maybe you should do your own research into it. And I think its wrong that some people are saying how he should be out in jail for ones opinion, which is legal. We all have our own opinions and thoughts on it. I think this may be try in a way but anyone can fix pictures to make them a sertain way. But its very quite possible the media and NASA set this up for the public. Maybe Niel Armstrong was not the FIRST man on the moon, i mean if you think about it NASA could have tested it out one or more times on their own and then record one new one for the public and just tell us, so now Niel Arstrong is a very famous person because of it. We shall never no untill one shall expose it...
How long can US fool the world ?? With Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin still not ready to swear on the Bible that they have landed on the moon, the US lunar landing is a BIG JOKE ...!!( with all evidence !!)
an Indian in 2017 may be the first to land on moon followed by Chinese in 2021 !!
The world may sit up and take note !!
I completely agree.
But I do have one question.
Why did they do this anyway?
Why did they (NASA) lie about Neil Armstrong landing on the moon?
Can you please answer this?
Asap please?
Thanks you guys
=)
yes well you see i am doing a progect at high school and you were to pick one. any one so i picked space and all the other sites don't have much info but this one does so i am going to tell all my mates about your web site. and thanks for the help
BS BS BS wut u wrote it aint true cauz the LM machine has a diff mass on the moon so it'll b lighter due to the gravity on the moon. The flag will b movin because there is radiant wind on the moon and up there the sun is far away from earth so the heat wont b 250 degrees dats y they wear space suit y do u think the space suit is for? u should think bout all dese issue b4 u post it cauz uer an idiot if they didnt actually land on the moon y would they say so? and dunt tell me dese BS about russian did cauz i had enuf of all dese BS
no 1 has been to the moon till today's date nd the us government wants to be ahead of everyone, they want to ahead cause the us govt wants dominant over other countries. this whole crap was shot in a studio. one of the main fact is that in the video taken shows that as if the flag waves but no way in the moon a flag can wave. this is one of the strongest evidence of all.
Anonymous uer worng u've been fooled by dis poster flag can wave cauz there's radio wave in space its not fake and its not the strongest evidence of all uer stupid for not admitting dis fact government does want to b ahead of any1 but dey dnt want to dominant other countries dey got their own problems to worry about. We can go onto the moon now due to the technology and the video is true so admit the fact dis is true its not fake if u fink its fake den u got a fucked up head
so who posted sayin it aint true uer stupid
Google "mythbuster Moon", you will find out
This Is Fuckking Stupid !
Neil Was In Deed The First Man On The Moon.
Your An IDIOT !
The Flag Has Wires In It Give It The Impression Of Waveing. If You Dont Know That You Should Go DIE.
Im An 8th Grader and I Even Know That. HAHAHA Pretty Sad.
i agree wif the last poster dude the person told us to search mythbuster uer such a idiot i fink u r fucked in da head dude he did land on da moon and dats dat i cant belive a 8th grader also believe in dis i fink u should do soem reasearch if u fink uer smart mythbuster boy<< aint true full of BS!!!
NASA can b given OSCAR awards 4 tis achievement..
super settings..........
this is a bunch of bull he never went to the moon for the simple fact that there's no air on the moon so why is the flag blowing
last poster FFS no Air BS there's wind up there called the radiate waves u stupid if u didnt know dis uer fucked in da head and OSCAR awards pfft does it look lyk dey hav awards back den? jus to get dem famous duhhh! dey didnt need dat u should do more research BTW THERE IS WIND UP THERE RADIATE WAVES!!!
add me on msn if u wanna talk about dis shit any1 jus post here
this is bull sh** Niel Armstrong did land on the moon. If you want REAl evidence then call NASA. They did it. and why would they go through all this trouble just to fake putting someone on the moon?!?!?! IT HAPPENED! and are you going to say thet Guy La Librte didn't go to space???
this is bull sh** Niel Armstrong did land on the moon. If you want REAl evidence then call NASA. They did it. and why would they go through all this trouble just to fake putting someone on the moon?!?!?! IT HAPPENED! and are you going to say thet Guy La Librte didn't go to space???
ty last poster i agree wif u TYVM!!!!!!
thanx deepak i knw it is fake all the people think neil armstrong was the first to land on moon but noone has real proof not even the nasa the sample of rock they bought from moon was confirmed as petrified wood.neil armstrond himself has said that the nasa had threatened to kill him if he says it was fake.the converstion was secretly recorded and sold the nasa tried to suppress it now only aa few people know that it is fake.i knew it was fake since i was 9 years and even now iam 14 i believe it is fake. and the people who think neil armstrong landed on moon could just remain ignorant what can we do when people do not want to know wat is true and will follow what thier stupid fathers mothers or teachers told them
thanx deepak i knw it is fake all the people think neil armstrong was the first to land on moon but noone has real proof not even the nasa the sample of rock they bought from moon was confirmed as petrified wood.neil armstrond himself has said that the nasa had threatened to kill him if he says it was fake.the converstion was secretly recorded and sold the nasa tried to suppress it now only aa few people know that it is fake.i knew it was fake since i was 9 years and even now iam 14 i believe it is fake. and the people who think neil armstrong landed on moon could just remain ignorant what can we do when people do not want to know wat is true and will follow what thier stupid fathers mothers or teachers told them
true dark lord uer fact is wrong u r fucked in the head if he didnt land on the moon y would the scientist kno so much of outer space and the moon? If u think eur smart but uer not so go fuck eurself he did go on dis website ppl say its true on the comment alot of people so go get fucked
http://astroprofspage.com/archives/162#comment-145974
and dey did bring some moonstone shithead if he didnt y would we kno more aobut outerspace and the moon so go GF!
u guys kno dat im rite dat y u dnt post comments =] haha u guys face it dis is the true fact no matter how u make it up its always real.
YA ITS true Neil Armstrong didnt Landed on Moon According to me because . Till now nasa also dint Landed in the moon after 75 years of landing with the latest technology
Not possible it is purely HOLLYWOOD SETTINGS
do u want proofs? go on dis website http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm all the information u need dude. I fink uer stupid enuf not to believe dis is true. Maybe coz uer Russian u fink u guys landed on the moon but dey didnt. They couldnt even afford to make spaceships. Tell me y dnt u believe dat America landed on the moon face it its the fact. No one will lie about dis. U think the workers worked on the spaceships and all that will keep their mouths shut?. 400,000 people think about it mate. Tell me y dnt u believe in it i will answer every possible questions u have.
i believe it is a big fat lie... i have given the reasons...
lmao if it is u think russian can keep thier mouth shut? So many ppl at NASA also i made my point now get lost. No one will lie about dis.
moon landing is complete flake the USA inorder to get ahead of Russia in space reserch feild has done this.this gave them an unfair advantage during cold war.
Hi !.
You re, I guess , probably curious to know how one can collect a huge starting capital .
There is no initial capital needed You may start earning with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.
AimTrust is what you thought of all the time
AimTrust incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.
Its head office is in Panama with offices everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your chance That`s what you desire!
I`m happy and lucky, I began to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to select a proper companion utilizes your savings in a right way - that`s it!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and my first deposit was 1 grand only!
It`s easy to get involved , just click this link http://idagodyf.100freemb.com/gapalo.html
and lucky you`re! Let`s take this option together to feel the smell of real money
lmfao dude russia didnt even hav the money to make spacecrafts wut u on about i made my points the website is full of details and proofs. You r so stupid to belive its fake coz uer russian lemme guess u fink dey went up thier first please dnt giv me dis bull shit tyvm.
if anybody says dat niel amstrong has landed on the moon then its time i should show u a video.... trust me u will belev it then, NO BUDY HAS LANDED ON THE MOON... Ashish
bull and furthermore shit. All of this conspiracy theory is dreamt up by idiots.
Apart from the obvious flaws in their observations, it would be incredible for NASA to have staged the whole thing over several years only to have made such apparent blunders. After all it is rocket science!
is it real? is it fake? honestly i believe we landed on the moon, but i am certainly opene mined about conspiracy theories such as these. usually dreamed up by a bunch of over active imaginations, and people who are certain the governtment lies about everything. sure they lie, of course not all the time. i did enjoy capricorn one, does anyone remember that movie? good example.usually people have no evidence to back up their claims, just little things like light positioning, or wind blowing the flag when it shouldnt etc. their are many facts i am sure most of use dont realize when we make these hoax claims. i am not saying they arent possible, just imagined and thought up by overactive minds.
Classic case of making up a lie based on utterly false assumptions. The "discrepancies" raised have been shown to not be in any way shape or form discrepancies at all and they most certainly do not mean the moon landings were fake. If anything, they prove the contrary.
These so-called problems are now so well known, as is their disproving, that it takes a minimal amount of research to find out about them and why they are not really problems at all.
I totaly agree that the moon landing was fake.
You have great evidence and i back u 100%
I was just going through and found this...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast23feb_2/
Have a look...
I DO BELIEVE THIS
THANKS FOR INFORMING ALL OF US
Issues with issues:
4....you said it yourself. It's the sun.
10. In other words, it was just being effected by gravity.
hey dude the falg appears to wave because of the lack of gravity so it would be like that. just think about it
ok, this is all fake we didnt do to the moon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jk, jk, lol!
but i think it wasall a trik!!!!!!!!
You're all stupid and can't spell for crap. The landing on the moon was real. There was simply no dust kicked up because THERE'S NO AIR. And regarding the 'waving flag', it wasn't waving it was just crinkled and stiff. Thanks for entertaining the thought though.
amazinz this is a real proof to say Neil Amstrong did not land on moon.
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-mashups-moon-hoax-sneak-peek.html
Check it out b*tches! Myth Busters BUSTED each and every myth. So HA! We HAVE gone to the moon!
Well there are 3 or 4 theories about Moon landings, that I know of. One thing that I was able to conclude after going through the details of all different theories is that NASA has been lying to the public for 30 yrs or more.
Theory-1
This is the most widely accepted notion of Neil's Landing on Moon. This is in fact what we are also taught in schools.
Theory-2
This is the issues that you have cited in your blog. This claims that the Moon landings were completely faked as sited in your blog. But hang on there's still more to moon landing. One thing which most ordinary people doesn't know is that US has TWO space programs: (1) an open program headed by NASA and (2) a secret space program headed by the US Navy.
Theory-3
One of the most compelling source of evidence comes from Bill Copper who was an Intelligence officer from the Office of Naval Intelligence. From the docs that he had leaked out off secret NASA & US Navy files compeltely changes ur perspectives. He gives undeniable evidence that there are secret bases on the Moon mostly built with very sophisticated technologies. His conclusion is: Either man has never been to moon OR there is atmosphere on the moon (contrary to what we are taught in schools that moon has no atmosphere).
Theory-4
Here comes the revelation from Richard Hoagland. He worked as a NASA consultant and claims that NASA has been lying to public for over 30yrs or so, which I believe to be true. Further, he explains that the LIE is different at different levels. To me, he gives the best possible explanation that: Actually, man has landed on Moon and there are secret bases on Moon built using 'alien' technology and 'flying saucer' technology. However, NASA also staged a fake Moon landing in the deserts of Nevada (which is the photos cited in your blog). The reason he states is that, if ever people come to know about the secret bases on Moon and the things there off, then NASA can use the fake landing episode and disprove Moon landing episode.
To conclude, there is every reason to believe that there are alien or man made bases on the Moon.
From my research, I've come to the conclusion that there are secret bases (alien or manmade)on the Moon. The photos posted in your blog are a faked moon landing staged by NASA in the deserts of Nevada. The reason for faking the moon mission is that if ever the public comes to know of the secret bases on the moon (proven by Bill Cooper, Richard Hoagland etc.), then they can use the fake landing story as a means to disprove the official landing case and thus discredit the news about the secret basis as conspiracies or such theories.
unfortunately he didnt land moon
mythbuster proved it! in ur faces idiots, if it fake than how do we have the ISS up i space now and how do we recieve info from the moon if theres nothign there...aliens arent up there sending us info. yall are a bunch of no lifers and hobo asses who make up this shit to get money and attention cus ur selfish jerks!TAKE THAT U NO LIFERS!!
that felt good to say, so whos with me?
NEIL ARMSTRONG DIDNT LAND ON THE MOON! I DID! AHAHAHAHA I VISIT THE MOON EVERY SUMMER.....
Moon landing was real. Get detailed explanation to all the possible arguments here!
Did Neil Armstrong really go to the Moon or NASA had faked the Moon landings?
That is relly a great collection. Must follow the occupation of being a detective. Anyway, this was certainly a great info. Perhaps this all has been shooted at Area-51. But then, is the manned probe launching in front of the world, a fiction? What happened to the probe then? Weren't other international space agencies observeing Moon at that time? Didn't NASA take help of any other country to succeed this project? Thats it...
You guys are a bunch of idiots and are ignorant. The Soviet Union and other countries were closely monitoring the moon landings by radar and satellites. The Soviet Union would have been the first to cry foul if the moon landings were fake. And there were tens of thousands of people involved in this. Its impossible to pull off such a hoax involving so many people and not have someone come forward and expose the hoax with some credible evidence. And if N.A.S.A. really wanted to fake the moon landings then they would have done a better job. After all...they employ some of the brightest scientists. And you cant see stars in the background because it is daylight on the moon. Just like you cant see stars during the day from Earth. And what about the other moon landings? Were they fake too? The U.S. landed on the moon several times. And I challenge anyone to find a video or an audio interview of Neil Armstrong claiming that it was a hoax! And equipment left on the moon by the landings has been spotted by several unmanned probes in recent years. Even by Soviet probes. Youre just mad cause the Soviets didnt have the technology to land on the moon. All they did was copy the U.S.A. and could never get it right. They made an exact copy of our space shuttle called the "Buran". Its now sitting in a museum without ever having carried out a true mission. Go google the word "Buran" and you will see. And they were never able to build a vehicle capable of a moon landing. We were way ahead of them. They copied us and still couldnt get it right. THE U.S.A. RULES!!!
To Jose:
You said "And I challenge anyone to find a video or an audio interview of Neil Armstrong claiming that it was a hoax!"
Well, I suggest you check out a video interview of Richard Hoagland who was a NASA Consultant for years.
He mentions, that in a press meeting held in 1994, when Neil Amstrong was asked about the whole issue, Neil was quoted as saying "Parrots lie. Parrots don't tell the truth. Parrots often say what they are told to say".
This was his response. I think that says a lot. Here again, I'm not saying that Moon mission was altogether a fake, but definitely NASA has been lying to the public for at least 30 yrs on several issues.
Science don't LIE but Scientists do LIE if they are paid to..
Everyone have their own opinions.May be moonlanding is a hoax,but after all when asked we cannot reject what the world believes.Deepak's facts are very brainstorming and from those given info i think no can reject them completely.These facts are purely scientific and thats what the world need.Thanks for good reasons and arguments that was presented.Anyway we cant get to a conclusion until someone prove it to the humans that the great leap of mankind was a joke to laugh at.
You Americans are so uneducated. Most of you don't even know the difference beetween Poland and Holand. There was no landing on the moon and it's obvious. Why? Because if it would be possible there would be american flag painted there to warn everyone else who wants to enter. In the era of black and white tv and computers less powerfull than mobile phones today? Landing on the moon?
GET A FUCKING GRIP! Dumb asses!!!
This is all rubbish you should be ashamed! this man made history and who believes this should check out the video of him landing on the moon first because I don't think that he can fool the whole world! and I went to the museum and so everything with my own EYES! and I'm sure it's real! so get a life!
Issue 10: There is no air in space, therefore, the flag will continue to wave because there is little to no friction that stops it from waving. If you wave a flag on Earth, the particles in the air will create friction with the flag, and will eventually stop it from waving.
you have copied it from another site i know because i have seen it on another site.
open this
www.incredibletricks.blogspot.com
u will be shocked.
the flag is enough to prove everything
look at the flag in the picture of issue 3
I saw mythbusters and most of these "fakes" are proved wrong. The moon landing was real.
yahhh thats was right no one has ever been in the moon, your presantation was true and well presente. that was a hoax keep it up bruuuu, do u hav any evidence that you can present???
its really stupid !! they just took it in the hollywood set which is possible for any type of set .. so they have it there only !! i will proove , like wise titanic film was also taken in that holly wood set , but it was real , same like that this is wat to make russian people foolish , they they r fools
its just stupid to make russian people fool , but they r fool , because , in usa holly wood area watever type of set is displayed , like wise they have taken it in the set ,, like wise the film titanic was taken in the same set , but it is like and real , same like that , really stupid , tats it guyss
It is a wonderful fact i agree it with u . THANX for this infomatation
and what u said is true
:)
WHAT EVER U TOLD IS TRUE .IT WAS A SETUP. THANX FOR THIS INFO
i never would think that we r just made fools by the scientist. thanx dude
1. in 1969 there were no good cameras
2.moon rock examed in high tech labs
and scientist were 100% sure the rock is from a different plant so we had to go to the moon. Plus their were over 1 million people watching the take off of Apollo 11 so were the heck could they of gone unless they went to the moon plus i live in Ohio (home of Neil Armstrong) their is a museum here with rocks of moon plus the picture with no stars if you are looking on the moon your lucky to see about 3 stars. So im 100% sure of the landing oh by the way just because we didn't go to the moon lately doesn't mean we didn't go it cost about 100 million dollar just to build a shuttle plus gas plus paying astronaut
Hem, also there is a robo head in one of the picture... I'm not sure that aliens left that on the ground with no other evidence, just like that...CINEMA STUDIOOO!
http://www.enterprisemission.com/images/data/5.jpg
thanks
I dont agree with the issue of the flag waving.
When astronauts were planting the flagpole they rotated it back and forth to better penetrate the lunar soil (anyone who's set a blunt tent-post will know how this works). So of course the flag waved! Unfurling a piece of rolled-up cloth with stored angular momentum will naturally result in waves and ripples -- no breeze required!
Practically all of these "issues" to do with the moon have been disproved.
1. Shadows will not necessarily be in line from one light source. It depends on the differing heights of the terrain which you can just make out in the first picture.
2. A short shutter speed will create the effect as in picture 2
3 You won't see stars from the moons surface the light from the Sun will block them out in the third picture - proven, check out the Mythbusters site.
4. The reflection you are ssing in the visors is that of the Sun. It looks like the Sun to me at least
5 Automatic cameras have been around since the 50's you don't need to have anyone "man the camera" as in pic 5
6 Who said the moon was at 250 degrees C - it is not it is extremely cold. So film would not melt at all - Space is generally very cold not very hot.
7. The LEM is powerful yes, powerful to kick up dust and knock the flag over but not powerful enough to leave a crater.
8 This again has be proven bullshit. The dust on the moon does keep its shape due to its interlocking particles, again proven by Mythbusters. It does not work in the same way that sand & water do. It just keeps it's shape - for years.
9 Not quite sure what the point of this one is.
10 No No No the flag is not waving at all, i've watched it a dozen times. It is stiffened with wire and the wire broke as it was being unfurled - FACT FACT FACT
I wish people who atre not scientifically minded would stop demkonstrating their prowess with HTML and putting site full of rubbish up. It give the rest of us other scientists a really bad name
Fucking Annoyed (UK)
I can't believe that people are still doubting that Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. Deepak is a moron if he really believes that over 40 years later "The Truth" hasn't leaked out. If Governments are unable to hush up simple things like Presidential indescretions like bugging the Watergate offices or what Ms Lewinski did during her internship, could they get thousands of people to participate in a fraud of this scale? I think not! The Russians would have known exactly what the Apollo crew were doing. If it was a put up job, would they have gone along with it? No way, one sniff of anything fishy and they'd have crucified Nixon (rather than waiting for him to do it himself)!
Give it up, guys - thankfully, no government is smart enough to pull the wool over our eyes to this extent.
hmmm..........cool evidence
Frankly speeking really neil amstrong didnt landed on the moon. This is all hi tech drama held in sector-7 which is very strict area where if any flights go through that area then no mercy they will drop down that flight. All alien regarding researches are being done in that area. If any one has any dbts just type document in google enough. And one more very big truth that no one knows is that neil amstrong for the first he tried to drive and he crashed in practise labs. then never he tried to drive. Directly how can he drive in moon with out gravity ha ha LOL. This is high end drama. And all the people who believes I have one question for all them. Y the hell USA is keeping everything secretly regarding to aliens. This is high end drama and good one deepak.
see this video on youtube there are 6 parts.Watch all 6 parts.the link is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_4JpP-lSo&feature=related
If we keep reading books that tell that man did land on moon no one would think the other way
thanks the moon landingd are really fake. Armstrong should be hung - he is crazy. And we are crazy for believing that stupid Neil.
DEATH TO NEIL ARMSTRONG
gand mara tum madar chod...hahahaha
i actually beleve dis becoz de movie titanic was taken in a small swimming pool but it was shown as taken in a very large area.
this is such crap. The moon landing was absolutely true. get a hold of urself man.
i beleve dis .. i dont kno y
I believe that those picture that you used came from the movie Apollo 18. Of course those picture are very vulnerable because they are only created by the people behind the movie -.-".
as a little boy(age 9) in the caribbean i did never believe people land on moon ,,,a middle age man now and still don't believe it,,IF NEIL ARMSTRONG WALK ON THE MOON MY BALLS ARE SQUARE AND GREEN,,LIKE I'M FROM MARS LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
u r absolutely right deepak... but it reaches only for some people. hw could it reach all of us?
guys if neil is fake , then you publish it because more than 75% people don't know about it & i agree with you ........
if it is true then guys publish it , because more than 75% people don't know about is & i agree with you............
First and foremost, they did have special film as well as a protective shroud for the camera. lets think about this. Would NASA (already knowing the temperature range on the moon) really send a standard camera and film there?
Second. On the moon there is more than one light source. There’s light from the Sun as well from the Earth. DUH! The Sun rays are reflected off of the Earth to the Moon just like the Moon reflects light from the sun towards earth. If this was not the case, you would not be able to see the moon at night or during the day.
Same this applies to the visors the astronauts wore.
Also the LM did not use its main engine during the landing process, only during takeoff. It was using thrusters and gravity to maneuver to the moon’s surface.
Also if you read once in a while, an INDAIN space probe that was sent to the moon in (if my memory is right) 2006 detected traces of water in the rocks on the Lunar surface. So that could account for the foot print.
If you look at the LM Footpads, there is moon dust all over the back side of them a blind man can see that.
The two pictures of the flag, please. The one clearly shows one of the astronauts setting it up. and extending o it out from the center pole. The second one is showing the same thing. The Flag pole was designed with a main ole and a top pole the flag slides out from. So it rotates up from the main pole.
The pictures of the LM descending t the Moon, was taken from the other astronaut that was left behind on the main Apollo craft. The other footage off the landing was only from the LM itself using video camera set up on the bottom of the craft its self.
Please you people and your theories are so uneducated.
thanx a lot i thought that it was real now i know nasa is f*****king sh*t
totally fake
Hi deepak. Thanks for the blog. As you mentioned moon has got temperature of 250. At that temperature the american flag had burnt off. fortunately it was waving.
Mahesh.
Hi deepak. Thanks for the blog.
As you said moon has got 250 temperature. At that temp the american flag had burnt off. Very fortunate it is waving.
Maheey.
yes i saw it in one channel that America made a fake video to beat Russia because Russia and America had a ego Russia launched Sputnik. So to beat Russia America want to do an advanced step so it made a fake video that American men was the first to land on the Moon by using advanced graphics technologies like using today they made a fake one!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey guys u atleast should have common sense. He did land on moon. NASA wouldn't be that fool to make a fake video. If they really had to fake it they would have faked it in clever way that u fools couldnot notice. There are a lot of intelligent people out there. So respect their intelligence n stop fooling yourself.
Mythbusters did a good bit of work evaluating many of the questions raised in your piece. All their results (based on hard physical scientific testing - and as close as possible reinactments) supported the factual basis that Neal and Buz did land on the moon along with the following Mission and LEM commanders of Apollo 12,14,15,16 and 17. Two things really reinforce my belief that YES we did go and yes Neal did walk on the moon.
1. If the whole thing were a lie, a coverup, a staged event how did we wind up with the camera back on earth on Apollo 12 from a lunar proble that had been launched and landed on the moon almost 10 years earlier?
2. Again if the whole thing were faked how do you explain Apollo 13? Where is the logic in faking a mission that does not make it to the moon?
I remember not too long ago seeing an episode of Mythbusters that tested many of these questions you have raised with evaluating and testing the photographic and physical evidence and as closely as possible reinacting the events from evaluating the effects of a Lunar atmosphere to the characteristics of a boot print on the surface to the behavior of light and the reflections laying at different angles. All the testing they did supported the factual basis of the claim that the moon landings were real and that indeed Neal Armstrong and Buz
Aldren were the first two men (at least in our time) to set foot on the moon.
However there are two items that for me are even more compelling evidence...
1. If the whole lunar program were faked and if in fact man had not landed on the moon how did the astronauts of Apollo 12 bring back one of the key componants to a lunar voyeger craft that was launched from the earth and landed on the moon almost 10 years earlier?
2. If the whole lunar program were faked why Apollo 13? Why would NASA or whoever it was fake a failure? Why would they fake a mission that does not succeed in landing on the moon?
Just for your thought...
Hai Deepak, Thanks for the blog, i believe that the evidences proves that its a fack.. thank u for this information.
hey simple logic question,if neil has gone to moon in 1969-how many should have been by now with the present day tech.so no one.therefore not the neil either.that's it.u.s.a just bluffed,boasted.
Thank you @Deepak you deserve a medal (indeed) these unintelligent fools will never understand the laws of gravity. I was convinced after seeing that the flag appeared to be moving, under any circumstances where would air be coming in IT'S SPACE. The stars were not visible if your in space on the moon wouldn't the stars be more viable being that there isn't an atmosphere on the rock. Eventually the truth will come for the whole world to see , America cheated and that's really all that matters.
The truth is that what we believe in the mass media is that if someone else has told you... it is almost always not true.
I.E.
- the earth is flat
- the sun goes around the earth
- governments work for the people (they are solely controlled by big corporations)
- medicine heals people (proven that placebos are as good or better!)
- money is for us to buy and sell things (it is for us to go into debt and be controlled)
- the news is true (hehe, that always makes me laugh)
- public education is good for our children (it is used to create workers for the rich)
- etc...
So, it is not too far fetched to believe that the moon landings are totally nonsense. But again, common sense isn't so common anymore.
1st of all there has been a conspiracy going on for a while now and everybody knows that the Moon is only a reflection of the Sun. Secondly I don't understand how anybody in their right mind could even consider man walking on the Moon when they cant even put stars in the hoax, because there ABSOLUTELY should be stars in the background if it is dark! Not only was that a hoax, but a form of brainwashing! This was probably shot on an inselberg somewhere in Colorado or California. They were looking up at the Moon while doing this like every man, woman, and child, serpent, foul of the air, beast of the land, and sea,and every creepy thing has done and will continue to do until THAT GREAT DAY!
i agree however when neil place the flag in the moon he could of made the flag flap and if he did there is no wind to stop the movement of the flag but with the shadows and the other images im with you!!!!
This is really strange I wish Armstrong was alive to tell us from his own lips,anyway the Evidence is really Scientifically with no doubt.They make us believe that Armstrong walked on the Moon but can't force us to believe it in our Hearts untill they prove this Evidence Wrong which I know they can do with Brilliant Faking Method of them.
this is hilarious. there's so many dumb people who don't know anything about science, then see some weak evidence then think 'damn that must be right'
Did mythbusters go to the moon? I don't remember that episode! How can you argue something you have never experienced yourselves? Do you believe everything you see on tv???? Just because someone on tv says it's true....it's true? i don't believe in dinosaurs either =)
Thanks for the nice issues and evidence. I guess Neil Armstrong was not the first one to land on the moon, hmmmm.
i just did some work on this in school and the last one, the flag waving is because the top is made of aluminium so if u pul the bottom of the flag it starts to move and because theres no air resistance it carries on moving.
and the theres no stars is because there is too much light for the camera's to take in
i dont no wether 2 believ of not i was just learnin bout conspiracy theories so i these are what nasa sed
thx xx
This is all a lie. Neil Armstrong did walk on the moon and that should be the end of this. There are multiple reasons why your evidence is false and they have been all pointed out.
Deepak,
Why should we believe you? Do you have anything to back up your so called "issues." Are these based on your own theories? To me, yes as you have not presented any fact findings of your research. Do you qualify to prove these theories? What is your
background? We know nothing about it. So, I am not going to buy anything you presented here. Yes you will have some followers who will believe you blindly. Still that doesn't make you an expart.
Calm down Id like to hope its real but it might not be its not deepaks fault
Calm doen id like to hope its real but it might not be its not deepaks fault
You know the lights could have been from the cameras and the one filming the landing could be a satellite send by NASA earlier.
Our Generation is the only one that has come out to the public about calling out our fu**ed up government. Of course they didn't land on the moon your entire generation fron the 60s &70s are completely brain washed believing everything you guys heard on the magical box we call television lol. The government has and will never tell you the truth. I hope the president and the entire government of the United states dies gets murderd for what they have done to our country and people.
I totally agree with you and as a scientist the issues u have showed are correct.Thanks for the information
thanks for revealing the conspiracy of u.s.a .they actually fooled themselves.
Deepak you are absolutely right. Neil armstrong didn't land on the moon.
I have some more issues about that.
Issue 1: When a rocket is in motion it needs less fuel.so if rocket is landed on the moon then the rocket needs to much fuel to fly away from there. And if they should go on the moon with too much fuel then there is a possibility of a crash landing on the moon. So we can only go to the moon. Cannot return from there. So if neil armstrong really gone to the moon then he cannot return from there.
Issue 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRSk04ZJFN8
see this video.
In this video a guy goes to neil armstrong and he held a bible.
So he said to neil armstrong that "neil armstrong put your left hand on this holy bible and swear to god that you walked on the moon"
But neil armstrong didn't swear that he walked on the moon.
Issue 3: If neil armstrong really gone to space then wyh he didn't gone to any other space mission in some next years. Why he was hidden from everyone before he died. Because if come in public and say something about mission moon then the secret of mission moon will be revealed.
Issue 4: The main team of mission moon has 9 main persons.(Ex- Scientists, Engineers, etc) died one by one accidentally. Why? Because if they come in public they should say something about mission moon. And the seret should be revealed.
Issue 5: The mission moon was happen on 21st july, 1969. In 50's 60's and 70's Russia and U.S.A want to beat each other in space science. So USA do all this to beat Russia in space Science. And this all is fake.
I think that deepak is right. Neil Armstrong didn't walked on the moon. This all is fake.
Dear commentators. First of all, Haters be Hatin'. Second of all, unless you have real proof that Neil Armstrong did in fact land on the moon, you should respect the writer. The writer actually has photographic views, and millions of people indeed believe Neil never landed on the moon. Feel free to go ahead to make your own thread, I'll be there to watch.
I don't really don't care, but there are some theories, and the LM engine evidence was your strongest. Indeed, most apollo missions had deliberate Impacts on the moon due to its primitive technology than our modern space craft engines.
The moon landing is definitely real, you need to talk to NASA. ( There was a pole in the flag, that is what kept it up )
Brother,
I am an Indian. Still I believe that Neil landed on Moon. All these things are real. There is no doubt they have landed on moon.
Don't think you are the most intelligent man on earth. All these years we had known about this landing. Even USA's rival: USSR: couldn't find out it was fake. USSR had some of the greatest scientists ever lived. And still has. You are spreading bad information. And I hope you know that this is the biggest idiotic thing I have ever heard. You are harming a man's reputation. A country's reputation. One of my friend told me about your things and he thinks everything you said was real. He says it is proved. And you should be put in jail.
If you have any doubt about the landing talk to NASA.
LEARN TO RESPECT MAN. We know that you are doing this to get some reputation.
Reputation cannot be earned by destroying others reputation.
Reputation is not taken. And not purchased from market. But earned
Post a Comment